
Some state workers
really need raises
On Jan. 5, Daily Mail reporter Ry Rivard wrote an article titled"Outlook gloomy for raises."
This is not new news for West Virginia state employees who, inthe past four years, have not received merit or performance-basedraises, just cost-of-living increases.
Gov. Manchin's spokesman, Matt Turner, stated in the same articlethat "this administration has been careful with its spending, andwe're going to have to be even more careful."
Yes, he is right about being careful now and in the future, buthe couldn't possibly mean they've been careful in the past.
First, I think renovating the old Department of Motor Vehiclesbuilding in Charleston to host meetings is a great idea. Butrenovating Holly Grove and renovating the Governor's Mansion with$12,000 vanities is absurd.
If I cannot buy a $12,000 vanity, then the governor and firstlady should not be spending the kind of money made available by thetaxpayers of West Virginia.
Second, our state representatives need to do a little moreresearch than they are currently doing. There are state employeesgetting raises and six-figure salaries, but they are the ones ontop.
How do top-level managers get raises, but the lower echelon doesnot? This hardly seems fair. Many of those on the lower echelons arebarely making ends meet.
The salaries of state employees are public knowledge. I do notsee enough hoopla from state employees about this issue.
Am I the only one that is concerned about this?
I am furious. But I cannot fight this alone.
Third, as the State Journal reported on Jan. 7, lawmakers need to"govern prudently." In other words, let's not worry about licenseplates and other things that are not relative at this point.
Let's get on the ballot the issues that are most important likehealth care, raises, retirement, roads and education. Enoughfoolishness already.
We voted the lawmakers into their offices to do the job. Nowlet's require them to do the job.
I am certainly demanding it.
Stephanie F. Stover
Charleston
1st District should oust Alan Mollohan
Unlike Michelle Obama, I have always been proud of my country -proud of the principles of government and conduct set forth by ourFounders, and by the example they set as a testament to thoseprinciples.
We have strayed from the course they charted on many occasionsduring our history, but like a listing vessel, we have managed toright ourselves and continue on course.
The state of Massachusetts did this very thing on Jan. 19 of thisyear. They threw off a one-party rule that was instituted in 1972with the election of Ted Kennedy.
Surely the people of the First District of West Virginia, inwhose veins course the blood of our magnificent and fiercelyindependent forebears, will rise up and do the same as the people ofMassachusetts.
Let us elect as our representative a person of character who willdo honor to our Constitution.
Alan Mollohan has filed for reelection. This is one of the mostcorrupt members of the House of Representatives. He supports, andstated that he will vote for, the so-called health bill - a piece ofwork that will not pass constitutional muster according to mostscholars. He voted to continue funding the sinister group "Acorn."
If the good and right-thinking people of the great state ofMassachusetts can deny office to a candidate with no legislativerecord, surely we can oust a person with the shabby record of AlanMollohan.
Many folks have filed for that position. Let's examine each ofthose candidates, and get their commitment to uphold ourconstitutional values before deciding.
When that person replaces Mollohan, they must know that they canbe replaced in 2010, something we should have done 28 years ago. Wedeserve better.
Denver McMullen
Middlebourne